Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Phase 1 Review Deadline Extended to Novemer 30


As reported on the LibNews and Collier Library Weeding blogs on November 1, we have been experiencing intermittent problems with the online candidate lists for our ongoing weeding project. We have been unable to isolate the cause of the problem, but it is currently under investigation.

 
Because of the difficulties with the online lists, we are extending Phase 1 (LC Class P) review through November 30.  Please complete your review of Phase 1 (in-person or online) by this date.  

As you work with the online lists, we recommend that you use Chrome or Firefox. The ongoing problems seem to be most frequently encountered by those using Internet Explorer. When reviewing the candidate lists, please make sure that you click the “Save” button at the top left side of the screen before exiting the page. After your recommendations have been successfully saved, you should briefly see a “Your input has been saved” message at the top of the screen. Please be patient when saving changes, especially for lists that have a large number of items. Some users have reported receiving an “unresponsive page” error with Chrome. However, those that choose the “wait” option report that their changes do save successfully.

Thanks again for your participation in the project.  

Thursday, November 1, 2012

Online Candidate List Problems

We have received reports of intermittent problems with our online candidate lists. We are currently investigating the issue. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Review Reminders

Online Review

As you review the online candidate lists, please remember to click the "Save" button at the top left side of the screen before exiting the system. It may take a few minutes to save the recommendations, especially for call numbers with a large number of candidates. After your recommendations have been successfully saved to the system, you should see "Your input has been saved" at the top of the list. If you do not see this message, your recommendations have not been saved.

Print Review

When reviewing the print candidates, please make sure to check the appropriate call numbers in the oversize section (third floor). This will be particularly important for subject areas with a large number of oversize books (for example, art).

Problems/Questions

If you have any problems reviewing the candidates or have questions about the process, please contact collectiondevelopment@una.edu.

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Your Input is Crucial

We greatly appreciate all of the feedback that we have received from teaching faculty about our weeding project. Our criteria is based on several factors (circulation, availability from resource sharing partners, age, etc.). In addition we also compared titles to Choice and Resources for College Libraries. None of the titles flagged should have been reviewed in Choice or included in Resources for College Libraries.  However, some titles by major authors, classic works, important series, etc. may have ended up as withdrawal "candidates."  This is because it is almost impossible to identify these types of criteria using an automated approach.  We are relying on faculty to provide expert opinion in these cases.  This is the primary reason we sought to include faculty input on the process rather than simply running circulation numbers and discarding accordingly.   

Before a title is withdrawn,a professional librarian will examine it in context.  We are confident that this multi layered process (criteria, faculty review, librarian review) will lead to retention of important items.  So, please remember to vote for the "candidates" that you feel should remain in the library.

Flagging Update

Flagging of Phase 2 withdrawal candidates has been completed, and students are currently flagging the Phase 3 withdrawal candidates. Email notification will be sent to the campus community when this task is complete. Remember, the online candidate lists are currently available for Phases 1-3. So, you can get a head start on Phase 3 by examining the online lists.

Phase 1 Deadline is Almost Here

The deadline for faculty review of Phase 1 withdrawal candidates is October 31. Please make sure that you review the candidates by this date. You can review the candidates in person in Collier Library or online. If you have any questions, please contact collectiondevelopment@una.edu.

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

Candidate Lists - Review In Person or Online

Collier Library seeks faculty input in the review of the withdrawal candidates. While use of carefully defined withdrawal criteria have helped us to arrive at well-thought out lists of candidates, we will rely heavily on the expertise of teaching faculty to ensure that core titles in their discipline are not withdrawn. Faculty can review the candidates in two ways - in person in Collier Library or using the online candidate lists.

Review in person:
Withdrawal candidates will be "flagged" with yellow slips and turned down on the shelf. Faculty can use the yellow slips to object to the withdrawal of individual titles (instructions are included on the flag).  As the flagging of the physical books is very time-consuming, faculty will not be able to review all books in person at this time. As of August 21, 2012 all Phase 1 books have been flagged and work is underway on Phase 2. As soon as Phase 2 flagging is complete, we will begin flagging Phase 3 books. We will post notices on this blog upon the completion of flagging the candidates in each phase.

Instructions for using the online lists:
Click here to access the online candidate lists, then click the "Sign In" button and login using your UNAPORTAL email address and password. For each phase, there will be multiple lists to review. The lists are broken down by Library of Congress Classification. To open a list, simply click on the desired call letter, for example P - Philology. Linguistics.  You can recommend that the library keep an item by clicking on the drop-down menu for that item in the "Recommendation" column and selecting the appropriate option. The list gives users several options for selecting why to keep an item - classic work, major author, important series, supports new program, part of a set, other. When selecting the "other" option, we ask that you provide a brief reason. 

At the end of the review period for each phase, library personnel will review recommendations made on both the online candidate lists and the printed flags. Careful consideration will be given to recommendations made by faculty. However, a recommendation to keep does not guarantee that a title will be kept.  

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Q&A


Common Questions About Weeding

Q: What is "weeding?"
A: Weeding is the deselection of books, journals, or other such items from a library's collection.  This process takes place at all libraries on a regular basis.  If libraries did not "weed" materials then collections would quickly outgrow buildings.  

Q: Why would a library discard timeless, valuable classics?  
A: It is a librarian’s job to not only build a collection but to maintain it as well.  The needs of the user (faculty and students) population changes over time.  Many of the books that are tagged as “Withdrawal Candidates” often have not been touched in 30 or 40 years.  In some cases they have never been checked out.  This is a good indication that these titles don’t fit the needs of our users.  In some cases these books may be second copies, unpopular editions of a work, etc.  This is why we need to look at them!  At the same time we will examine a list of “Preservation Candidates.”  If we find that these titles are actually preservation worthy due to rarity then we will take measures to secure these titles to mitigate any further damage due to handling, exposure to elements, etc. 

Q: The library said that it is throwing away print books and replacing with ebooks,
A: The library has not considered this option.  Yes, we add ebooks all the time.  We also continue to add print books.  At this stage we add both.  Since print storage space is more precious than e storage space we have to make sure that we position the stacks for continued growth of collections that fit current curriculum and needs.

Q: You said that you were only looking at books that never circulated in my section; however, I see that the book has been stamped in the past which clearly indicates it has been checked out.
A: Yes, some of the books we indicated as “never checked out” were actually circulated.  Our data can only go back as far as the Notis system which predates our current Voyager system.  This means that it is possible that a book that has not circulated prior to the mid-1980s will appear on our list.  Still a title that has not circulated in 30 or 40 years deserves examination.

Q: Why are there so many books that have not been looked at in decades?
A: There can be any number of reasons.  It could be that some of these items were never destined for greatness.  Could be that faculty interests and curriculum needs have changed over the years.  There is no one answer.

Q: There are lots of books with yellow “Withdrawal Candidate” flags.  Are you going to remove all of these books?
A: The answer is certainly not.  Remember these are “candidates” so once reviewed by campus faculty and librarians many will be returned to their home in the stacks.

Q: How can I make sure we are using books?
A: For the academic library print book use is driven by assignments.  We encourage teaching faculty to create assignments that require the use of books.  The fact is that print book circulation nationally has dropped from year to year.  This means that libraries slow down purchasing print books and publishers hurt because libraries can’t or won’t buy as many books as in the past. 

Q: People don’t like ebooks!
A: While some people are resistant to ebooks this statement is not accurate.  The sale of ebooks has taken off in the past couple of years, much of this due to improved ereaders and the advent of the iPad.

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

Weeding Project Overview

 
Collier Library is undertaking a long overdue weeding of print books.  Weeding is the process of culling a library’s print materials of selective titles that no longer serve the needs of its users.  As most of you know, today’s academic library no longer points to the print collection’s size as an indicator of quality or success.  With expanding availability of electronic materials--Collier currently offers access to over 200,000 ebooks and 19,000 online journals--collections have actually grown more rapidly than in the days of print.  In addition, today’s students work more collaboratively and require facilities that meet these needs.  As a result, it is important that Collier recognizes these trends with an eye toward spaces designed for student use and collections that mirror current curriculum.  With this in mind we will weed the existing book collection to 1) Make more room for student-centered learning facilities and 2) Ensure that print collections are optimized for relevance and currency.  To achieve this we need your input.

 We partnered with Sustainable Collections Services (SCS) to develop rules to identify items for possibly withdrawal. SCS is currently working with several top tier academic libraries such as Johns Hopkins, California State University System, and James Madison University on similar projects.  SCS extracted, compiled, and analyzed our data to develop a list of “withdrawal candidates.” This list provides a starting point for the discussion of materials eligible for withdrawal.  Data used to identify withdrawal candidates included: most recent circulation date, publication date, and the number of libraries holding the item in the US. The rules associated with each of these factors varied by subject area – for example, a more recent publication date is more important for nursing and science subjects than for history or literature books.

Starting in July Collier faculty, staff, and student workers will begin “flagging” withdrawal candidates.  We invite teaching faculty to come over and visit your call number range when flagged and provide input on whether or not a title should be withdrawn.  An email notification will be sent to the campus when each phase of flagging is complete.

This will be a 4 phase operation beginning with call number P.  The tentative timeline is:

Phase 1- Collier Main books with call numbers beginning with P
(Faculty review complete by October 31, 2012)
Phase 2—Collier Main books with call numbers beginning with A-G
(Faculty review complete by February 28, 2013)
Phase 3—Collier Main books with call numbers beginning with H-O and Q-Z
(Faculty review complete by May 31, 2013)
Phase 4—Collier Reference Collection
(Faculty review complete by October 31, 2013)






Please visit this blog often to find detailed information about the project and updates on the status of the various phases. Please direct any comments/concerns on the process to collectiondevelopment@una.edu.

Tentative Weeding Project Timeline

The following tentative timeline has been established for the Collier Library weeding project. Dates are subject to change. Use the links below Phase 1-3 to see the Library of Congress Classification Outline for the call numbers under review. This will give you an overview of the subject areas covered in the call numbers. A separate listing of the actual withdrawal candidates for each classification will also be available.
 

Faculty Review Timeline

Phase 1 – Collier Main books with call numbers beginning with P
All faculty review must be complete by October 31, 2012 

Phase 2 – Collier Main books with call numbers beginning with A-G
All faculty review must be complete by February 28, 2013 

Phase 3 – Collier Main books with call numbers H-O and Q-Z
All faculty review must be complete by May 31, 2013 Friday, August 16, 2013
Phase 4 – Collier Reference Collection
All faculty review must be complete by October 31, 2013

Detailed Timeline
July-mid August 2012
  • Flags will be put in Phase 1 withdrawal candidates.Withdrawal candidate lists will be made available on the library’s website.
Mid-August 2012 – October 31, 2012
  • Faculty may review Phase 1 books. Objections to withdrawal can be made online or on the book flag.
  • Library faculty and staff will flag Phase 2 books.
November 1, 2012 – February 28, 2013
  • Faculty may review Phase 2 books. Objections to withdrawal can be made online or on the book flag.
  • Library faculty and staff will flag Phase 3 books.
  • Library evaluation of Phase 1 recommendations will take place.  Phase 1 items to be withdrawn will be removed from the shelves.
 March 1, 2013 – May 15, 2013
  • Faculty may review Phase 3 books.  Objections to withdrawal can be made online or on the book flag.
  • Library evaluation of Phase 2 recommendations will take place.  Phase 2 items to be withdrawn will be removed from the shelves.
  • Cataloging personnel will begin processing Phase 1 withdrawals.
May 15, 2013 – August 31, 2013
  • Library evaluation of Phase 3 recommendations will take place.  Phase 3 items to be withdrawn will be removed from the shelves.
  • Library faculty and staff will flag Phase 4 books.
Mid-August 2013 – October 31, 2013
  • Cataloging personnel will begin processing Phase 2 and Phase 3 withdrawals.
  • Faculty may review Phase 4 books. Objections to withdrawal can be made online or on the book flag.
November 1,  2013 – February 28, 2014
  • Library evaluation of Phase 4 recommendations will take place.  Phase 4 items to be withdrawn will be removed from the shelves.

Examining the Collection

After analyzing our data and comparing it to sources such as WorldCat, Resources for College Libraries, and Choice Reviews, SCS was able to give us some detailed information about our circulating collection.

While the criteria below are not the exact criteria used to create our candidate lists, the chart provides an overview of some key data about our titles - circulation history, other Alabama and US holdings of items, availability in electronic book format, etc.


University of North Alabama Summary -Circulating Collection 
 Title CountItem CountPercent of Filtered Item Records
All Bib Records270,286286,073N/A
All Bib Records - Filtered196,137207,218100%
Record Counts - Circulation    
Circulation - No Historical Charges (at the title level)63,44566,31932%
No circulations in past 5 years (4/1/07 onwards)161,663170,14282%
No circulations in past 10 years (4/1/02 onwards)133,314140,18168%
Holdings Counts - WorldCat   
> 100 holdings in USA 174,662183,89689%
> 5 holdings in Alabama119,297126,43161%
< 5 holdings in USA 7037850%
0 other holdings in Alabama13,37614,5077%
Other Factors   
Publication Year before 2000167,328177,72986%
Publication Year before 1990136,430146,24271%
Hathi Trust Public Domain Match7,0078,4794%
CHOICE Reviewed34,64135,11717%
CHOICE Outstanding Academic Titles6,3047,0143%
In RCL10,70311,1765%
Other Form Ebook4,7034,8332%
Titles with at least one additional copy1,5403,6022%




Selecting Withdrawal Candidates


The library has established several sets of rules-based criteria for identifying "withdrawal candidates" to be considered for weeding. The Library of Congress Classifications and the corresponding criteria used to identify withdrawal candidates are listed below.



Class B - Philosophy, Psychology, Religion
(except BF Pscyhology - See Criteria for Q's for these items)
Criteria for selecting withdrawal candidates: 
  • Titles that have not circulated since 2000
  • Titles that are at least 10 years old (based on imprint date
  • Titles held by 100 or more US libraries
  • Titles held by any 3 resource sharing partners  OR by one of our geographical peers (Athens State, UAH, and A&M)
  • Titles added to the collection more than 5 years ago
  • Titles not reviewed in Choice
  • Titles not in Resources for College Libraries



Criteria for selecting withdrawal candidates:
  • Titles that have never circulated
  • Titles that are at least 30 years old 
  • Titles held 200 or more US libraries
  • Titles held by any 3 resource sharing partners  OR by one of our geographical peers (Athens State, UAH, and A&M)
  • Titles added to the collection more than 5 years ago 
  • Titles not reviewed in Choice
  • Titles not in Resources for College Libraries


Class L - Education

Criteria for selecting withdrawal candidates:
  • Titles that have not circulated since 2000
  • Titles that are at least 10 years old (based on imprint date)
  • Titles held by 100 or more US libraries
  • Titles held by any 3 resource sharing partners  OR by one of our geographical peers (Athens State, UAH, and A&M)
  • Titles added to the collection more than 5 years ago 
  • Titles not reviewed in Choice
  • Titles not in Resources for College Libraries


Criteria for selecting withdrawal candidates:
  • Titles that have never circulated
  • Titles held by 200 or more US libraries
  • Titles that are at least 20 years old
  • Titles held by any 3 resource sharing partners  OR by one of our geographical peers (Athens State, UAH, and A&M)
  • Titles added to the collection more than 5 years ago
  • Titles not reviewed in Choice
  • Titles not in Resources for College Libraries 


Criteria for selecting withdrawal candidates:

  • Titles that have never circulated
  • Titles that are at least 20 years old
  • Titles held by 200 or more US libraries
  • Titles held by any 3 resource sharing partners  OR by one of our geographical peers (Athens State, UAH, and A&M)
  • Titles added to the collection more than 5 years ago
  • Titles not reviewed in Choice
  • Titles not in Resources for College Libraries  


(Except subclasses TR - Photography, TS - Manufactures, TT - Handicrafts. Arts and crafts,
 and TX - Home Economics. See  criteria for A for these items.)
Criteria for selecting withdrawal candidates: 
  • Titles that have not circulated since 2002
  • Titles that are at least 5 years old (based on imprint date)
  • Titles held by 100 or more US libraries
  • Titles held by any 2 resource sharing partners  OR by one of our geographical peers (Athens State, UAH, and A&M)
  • Titles added to the collection more than 5 years ago 
  • Titles not reviewed in Choice
  • Titles not in Resources for College Libraries
 

Criteria for selecting withdrawal candidates:
  • Titles that have not circulated since 2000
  • Titles that are at least 10 years old (based on imprint date)
  • Titles held by 100 or more US libraries
  • Titles held by any 3 resource sharing partners  OR by one of our geographical peers (Athens State, UAH, and A&M)
  • Titles added to the collection more than 5 years ago 
  • Titles not reviewed in Choice
  • Titles not in Resources for College Libraries